Understand the key differences between ETL and ELT Understand the key differences between ETL and ELT

ETL vs ELT – understanding the key differences

ETL vs ELT – understanding the key differences
Author : Anshita Solanki   Posted :

Today’s modern businesses generate a lot of data. However, based on a survey of 1500 global enterprise leaders, commissioned by Seagate and conducted by IDC — 68% of data available to enterprises goes unused. Many companies don’t realize the importance of data analytics.

According to a BARC research report, businesses surveyed that use big data saw a profit increase of 8 percent, and a 10 percent reduction in overall cost.

According to the statistic above, adopting data analytics solutions can deliver high ROI. Although, there are organizations that gather data in large volumes, but are unable to understand how to store that data for further use. This is where the data warehouse and data lake come into the picture.

Data warehouses improve the speed and efficiency of accessing different datasets from a variety of sources. It also helps decision-makers derive insights to better plan business and marketing strategies. Data warehouse implementation requires an understanding of the difference between ETL (extract, transform and load) and ELT (extract, load and transform). ETL or ELT allows companies to easily consolidate data from multiple databases into a single repository. However, there’s a thin, but important line between both the data pipeline processes. Let’s understand how they differ from each other.

Understanding data pipeline

A data pipeline has a sole purpose – extracting data from the source and sending it to the destination. In this case, the source is the data collected from disparate systems and the destination is where the data is loaded into. Building data pipelines involves data processing to ensure proper data governance. There are two types of data integration processes: ETL and ELT.

What is ETL in data integration?

When raw data is extracted from various sources, it is imperative to clean that data into a meaningful and comprehensible format. Once the data is formatted, it is then transferred to a data warehouse for further analysis. This entire process is called ETL – where data is first extracted, transformed and then loaded into a data repository.

ETL routes the extracted data to a processing server, and then transforms the non-conforming data into SQL-based data. This ensures adherence to compliance. Some of the ETL tools to leverage:

  • Talend Open Studio
  • AWS Glue
  • Azure Data Factory
  • Google Cloud Dataflow
  • Microsoft SSIS

Read more to learn how Azure Data Factory accelerates data integration process.

ETL vs ELT

Benefits of ETL

  • Scalability: As data is structured and transformed prior to loading, the ETL process makes data analysis on a single, pre-defined use case scalable and faster.
  • Compliance: ETL makes it easier for users to adhere to rules and regulations like HIPPA, GDPR, etc., by omitting any sensitive data prior to loading in the target system.
  • Faster analysis: ETL ensures more efficient data queries than unstructured data, which leads to faster analysis.
  • Environment flexibility: ETL can be implemented on both on-premises as well as in a cloud environment.

What is ELT?

After the data is extracted, it is loaded into a data warehouse in its raw form. It is then transformed into the storage itself for further analysis. This entire process is called ELT – where data is extracted, loaded in a data repository and then transformed into a more understandable format.

ELT data integration process includes data cleansing, enrichment and data transformation that occur inside the data warehouse itself. The processing is done by a database engine rather than an ETL engine. Some of the ELT tools to use:

  • Amazon Snowflake
  • Amazon Redshift
  • Google BigQuery
  • Microsoft Azure

ETL vs ELT

Benefits of ELT

  • Flexible data analysis: Users can leverage data analysis in real-time without waiting for further data to be extracted and transformed.
  • Lower maintenance cost: As the transformation process is cloud-based, ELT offers a lower cost of maintaining the infrastructure.
  • High availability of data: All data is available at the data lake. This allows tools to access even unstructured data with loaded data.
  • Faster loading: Data is loaded at the data lake as soon as it is available without it being transformed first.

ETL vs ELT – understanding the difference

The obvious and primary factors that set them apart are:

  • ETL process includes transforming data in a separate processing server, while ELT transforms data within the data repository itself.
  • ETL transforms the data before sending it to the warehouse, while ELT sends raw data to the repository.

Let’s look at ETL and ELT comparison:

Parameters ETL ELT
Transform Raw data is transformed on the processing server. Raw data is transformed inside the target system.
Data storage ETL is the traditional process for transforming and incorporating structured or relational data into a cloud-based or on-premises data warehouse. ELT supports data warehouses, data lakes, data marts, etc.
Size and type of data ETL can be leveraged for small data sets which require complex transformation. ELT is suited for both structured and unstructured data of any size.
Security Pre-load transformation can eliminate PII. As ELT loads the data directly, more privacy safeguards are required.
Code-based transformation Transformation occurs on the secondary server. As a result, transforming large datasets can take longer. Transformation is performed in databases. The transformation step takes little time but can slow down the querying and analysis processes
Compliance ETL is better suited for compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA standards. There is more risk of a security breach in the case of ELT. Hence, it is difficult to comply with GDPR, HIPPA, etc.
Data output The output only comprises of structured data. ELT process offers structured, semi-structured and unstructured output data.
Re-queries As data is transformed before entering the destination, re-query is not possible. Raw data is directly loaded in ELT, making it possible to run re-queries multiple times.
Cost As it requires an additional server, the cost is comparatively higher. With no extra server required, the cost is low.
Maintenance The extra server needs more maintenance. With fewer systems, the maintenance burden is reduced.
Hardware The traditional, on-premises ETL process requires more hardware. As the ELT process is cloud-based, no additional hardware is required.

ETL vs ELT: What to choose?

ETL has been around since the 1970s as the amount of heterogenous data kept growing. With the rising demand for data warehouses, ETL became more essential. With the emergence of cloud computing and cloud storage in the 2000s, data lakes and data warehouses caused a new evolution called ELT.

For faster computing, ELT is the best suitable approach. However, ETL is preferred for better security and scalable data analytics. ETL and ELT, both have their pros and cons. Hence, based on your requirement, you can decide to leverage either of the data pipeline processes. It is advised to take the help of a service provider that is an expert in the field of data analytics and data science. This will enable you in better decision-making and will allow you to achieve improved ROI. To get a better understanding of the data integration process, talk to our data scientists.

Need Help?
We are here for you

Step into a new land of opportunities and unearth the benefits of digital transformation.